KCL  /  Essays  /  Prompt 3

KCL: Q3: Wider experience and ambitions

Around 100 words suggested; the shortest of the three answers

What else have you done to prepare outside of education, and why are these experiences useful?
What it’s really asking

KCL wants any relevant experience beyond formal study (work, volunteering, competitions, self-directed projects) and, crucially, your reflection on how it sharpened a skill or insight the course needs.

Why they ask it

This answer guards against the statement becoming purely abstract. But it only helps if you connect each experience to the subject. Unlinked extracurriculars waste characters you cannot spare, while a well-tied example shows maturity and self-awareness.

Three ways in
Lead with the skill

Pick one experience and explain the transferable skill it gave you, not the activity itself.

Tie it to the course

Link a job, volunteering role, or competition directly to a demand of the degree you are applying for.

Point forward

Use the final lines to show what this preparation lets you do next at degree level.

✕  Weak opening

“Outside of school I enjoy playing football, reading, and spending time with my friends, which have made me a well-rounded person.”

✓  Strong opening

“Tutoring two GCSE students forced me to explain probability three different ways until it landed, and it taught me that I only understand something when I can rebuild it for someone else.”

✦ Annotated example · Law applicant: Wider experience. Written by EssayLens to teach, not a real applicant’s essay. Tap a highlighted line →
Volunteering weekly at a Citizens Advice drop-in, I helped people decode benefit-refusal letters and housing notices. 1I learned that the law fails people less through unjust rules than through inaccessible language, and that explaining a clause clearly can change someone's week. 2Captaining my school's debate team taught me to build a case under time pressure 3and to concede a weak point gracefully rather than bluff past it. 4These experiences are useful because they tested, in public and with real stakes, the very skills a law degree refines: 5clarity, evidence, and the patience to hear the other side.6
  1. 1Leads with a sustained, concrete activity outside education, directly answering 'what else have you done.' Regularity (weekly) signals commitment rather than a one-off.
  2. 2Turns the experience into an insight about how law actually operates, demonstrating the analysis-over-description quality KCL values.
  3. 3Adds a second strand showing argumentation skill directly relevant to law, broadening the answer beyond a single activity.
  4. 4The detail about conceding shows intellectual honesty, not just performance, which reads as genuine and mature.
  5. 5Explicitly begins answering 'why are these experiences useful,' mapping the activities onto the demands of the course.
  6. 6Closes by naming three concrete law-relevant skills, landing the answer tightly within the short suggested word limit.
Stuck? Start here
  • Which non-academic experience taught you a skill this course actually needs?
  • Where did real life make a textbook concept suddenly concrete for you?
  • What does this preparation let you do next that you could not before?
Before you submit
  • Every experience is tied to a course-relevant skill or insight.
  • Reflection outweighs description, even in this short answer.
  • Ends pointing forward to degree-level study, not backward at a list.

Drafted it? Get an honest, admissions-style read, free.

Score my essay