Leiden  /  Essays  /  Prompt 1

Leiden: Letter of motivation

No fixed university-wide limit; aim for roughly 400-600 words (about one page). Check your programme page for specific guidance.

Write a letter of motivation explaining why you want to study this specific Leiden bachelor's programme, what relevant background and skills you bring, and why you are a good fit.
What it’s really asking

Leiden wants a focused, evidence-based case for why this exact programme fits you academically and practically, written in clear, direct prose. It is closer to a European motivation letter than a US personal essay.

Why they ask it

For applicants with a non-Dutch diploma, and for several selective programmes, the letter is where you show you understand what the degree involves and have genuine, demonstrable interest. It helps readers judge fit and the likelihood you will succeed and finish.

Three ways in
Mine the programme page

Pull up the course page and list two or three specific modules, tracks, or research themes that genuinely interest you, then write the letter toward those named features.

Lead with your best evidence

Identify the single strongest piece of proof for your interest (a book, a project, a subject you took beyond the syllabus) and build the letter around it rather than around your feelings.

Work back from your goal

Write down what you want to do after the degree, then show why this exact programme is the logical route there. This frames your motivation as considered rather than vague.

✕  Weak opening

“Ever since I was a child, I have been passionate about understanding the world and helping people, which is why Leiden University is my dream.”

✓  Strong opening

“Leiden's International Relations and Organisations track on global governance is the reason I am applying: I want to study how institutions like the UN actually constrain state behaviour, not just whether they should.”

✦ Annotated example · International Relations and Organisations: from model UN to method. Written by EssayLens to teach, not a real applicant’s essay. Tap a highlighted line →
Dear Admissions Committee, I am applying to the BSc International Relations and Organisations at Leiden University because I want to study how international institutions actually function, not how they are imagined in headlines. 1Over the past two years that interest has narrowed from a broad curiosity about world politics to a specific question: why do states sometimes comply with rulings of bodies they could ignore, such as the International Court of Justice based here in The Hague? My background has prepared me to study this rigorously. In my final two years I took Higher Level History, Economics, and English, and wrote my extended essay on whether economic sanctions on Iran between 2012 and 2015 changed state behaviour or merely signalled disapproval. 2Researching it taught me to separate what I wanted to find from what the data supported: I had expected a clear causal story, but the trade figures forced me to qualify almost every claim. That experience of being corrected by evidence is, I think, the habit your programme is built to train. I bring three skills I believe map onto the programme. First, languages: I am fluent in English and Spanish and have B1 German, which lets me read primary sources rather than relying only on translations. 3Second, quantitative literacy: I completed an online course in introductory statistics and can read a regression table, which I know underpins the methods training in your second and third years. Third, sustained writing: my history coursework required me to defend an argument across four thousand words, and I expect the analytical essays at Leiden to demand the same discipline. I have looked closely at how the programme is structured, and the design is part of why I am applying. The first year grounds students in political science, economic, and historical approaches before the specialisation tracks; 4I am drawn to the International Organisation track because it connects most directly to my question about compliance and institutions. I am also aware that Leiden teaches IR in English to a deliberately international cohort, and I want to be argued with by people who grew up reading different newspapers than I did. Beyond coursework, I have tested this interest in practice. I chaired the Security Council committee at two Model United Nations conferences, which meant managing disagreement under procedural rules rather than simply holding opinions. 5I learned that the procedure itself shapes outcomes, a small lesson that is really the whole subject of institutional study. I also tutored younger students in essay structure, which sharpened my own sense of how an argument should be built before it is decorated. I am confident I can handle a degree taught and assessed in English, and I am ready for the independence a Dutch research university expects. 6I want to spend three years learning to ask sharper questions about international order and to answer them with evidence rather than assertion. Leiden, and this programme in particular, is where I believe I can learn to do that well. Yours sincerely, A prospective student
  1. 1Opens by naming the exact programme and stating a precise intellectual interest. Leiden rewards fit with this specific programme, so the first sentence already distinguishes the applicant from a generic IR enthusiast.
  2. 2Gives concrete academic evidence (specific subjects, a real research question, a defined time frame) rather than declaring passion. This matches Leiden's preference for academic evidence over emotion.
  3. 3Lists transferable skills but immediately ties each to programme-relevant use (reading primary sources), so the skills read as evidence of fit rather than a resume dump.
  4. 4Demonstrates real research into the curriculum's structure (first-year foundations, later tracks). This is the single strongest signal of genuine fit and shows the applicant chose Leiden deliberately, not by ranking.
  5. 5Uses an extracurricular but frames it as a test of the same academic interest, keeping the letter focused. The detail about procedure over opinion subtly signals the analytical maturity Leiden wants.
  6. 6Closes by directly addressing fit with the Dutch academic model and English-medium study, reassuring the committee on the practical concerns specific to an international applicant at Leiden.
Stuck? Start here
  • Which two or three specific modules, tracks, or research themes on this programme page genuinely excite me, and why?
  • What is the single strongest concrete piece of evidence that I am interested in this subject beyond just liking it?
  • What do I want to do after this degree, and how does this exact programme get me there better than alternatives?
Before you submit
  • Have I named the specific programme and at least two of its actual features, not just the university?
  • Is at least 80% of the letter about the subject and the course rather than my personal story?
  • Did I cut every generic line about the city, the rankings, or being passionate since childhood?

Drafted it? Get an honest, admissions-style read, free.

Score my essay