LSE  /  Essays  /  Prompt 3

LSE: Question 3: Preparation outside formal education

Part of 4,000 characters total; 350 character minimum (often near the minimum is fine)

What else have you done to prepare outside of formal education, and why are these experiences useful?
What it’s really asking

This covers super-curricular work beyond your classes: extra reading, lectures, competitions, relevant work experience, or independent projects. LSE allows this to be the shortest answer, and says writing close to the 350-character minimum is entirely acceptable.

Why they ask it

This is the 20 percent. It shows initiative beyond the syllabus, but only counts if it connects back to the subject and includes reflection. The trap is filling it with unrelated extracurriculars. Keep it tight, keep it academic, and do not pad it to look impressive.

Three ways in
One activity, one idea

Describe one super-curricular activity (a lecture, competition, or independent reading) and the specific idea it gave you.

Experience as insight

Show relevant work experience through what it made you understand about the field, not through your duties.

Only if it earns its place

Mention an online course or self-study project only if you can say what you took from it intellectually.

✕  Weak opening

“Outside of school I enjoy playing the violin, captaining my soccer team, and volunteering at a local shelter.”

✓  Strong opening

“After an online lecture on behavioural economics, I ran a small survey at school to see if my classmates fell for the same framing effects, and most did.”

✦ Annotated example · Preparation beyond school. Written by EssayLens to teach, not a real applicant’s essay. Tap a highlighted line →
Outside the classroom, I worked through the first half of an introductory microeconomics textbook and kept a notebook of questions I could not yet answer. 1The most useful page is the messy one where I tried, and failed, to explain why diamonds cost more than water before I understood marginal value. 2I also listened regularly to economics podcasts, and one episode on behavioural nudges sent me looking for the original studies, where I learned to spot the gap between a striking result and a replicated one. 3These experiences are useful because they taught me to learn without a syllabus: to follow a question past the point where someone tells me to stop. 4Tutoring two younger students in maths sharpened this further, because explaining the margin to someone else exposed every soft spot in my own understanding. 5None of this makes me an economist, but it has made me a more honest reader of arguments, which is the preparation I value most.
  1. 1Foregrounds super-curricular reading, which LSE explicitly values over extracurricular activity. The notebook detail proves engagement rather than name-dropping a title.
  2. 2Showing a productive failure is more convincing than claiming mastery, and it demonstrates genuine wrestling with ideas (the paradox of value).
  3. 3Traces a chain from casual input to primary sources, evidencing the critical reading and independent follow-through the school rewards.
  4. 4Names the transferable habit (self-directed inquiry) that university study demands, tying the activity back to readiness for the course.
  5. 5Reframes a teaching activity as intellectual preparation, keeping the focus academic rather than slipping into a generic 'leadership' claim.
Stuck? Start here
  • What is one academic thing you did outside class that you would still talk about a year later?
  • Did any wider reading, lecture, or work experience change how you think about the subject?
  • Can you cut every activity that has no link to the course, and keep only the one or two that do?
Before you submit
  • Does every item connect back to the academic subject, with reflection rather than a duty list?
  • Have you resisted padding this answer with unrelated extracurriculars?
  • Is the answer appropriately short, given LSE says near the 350-character minimum is fine?

Drafted it? Get an honest, admissions-style read, free.

Score my essay