Richmond: Choose one of three (350-650 words)
350-650 words
Please respond to one of the following prompts in 350-650 words. 1) You have a platform to create change. What is an action or policy you might propose to address an issue of social injustice in your school or local community, or on a national or global scale? 2) Tell us about a time you learned something unexpected. What did you learn, and what happened next? 3) Richmond welcomes students from various backgrounds, perspectives, and lived experiences. What is at least one way you will contribute to our community that is not already mentioned in your application?
What it’s really asking
This is Richmond's only supplemental essay, and you choose one of three prompts. Prompt 1 wants a concrete change you would propose, ideally rooted in something you have witnessed. Prompt 2 wants a story of genuine surprise and what shifted afterward. Prompt 3 wants a specific way you will add to campus life that is not already in your application. There is no separate Why Richmond essay, so whichever you choose has to carry your whole voice. Note that these prompts are shared across first-year applicants regardless of intended major; there are no program-specific supplements.
Why they ask it
Richmond uses one open-ended essay because it wants to see how you think when given room to choose. The committee is reading for self-awareness, curiosity, and the way you engage with people and ideas. With test-optional admissions and no Why Richmond prompt, this essay is the clearest window they get into who you actually are, so they care far more about specificity and honest reflection than about the size of your topic.
Three ways in
Start from being wrong
For prompt 2, hunt for a moment you were wrong about something and the small detail that corrected you. The best unexpected-learning essays start in confusion, not triumph.
Build outward from one lived detail
For prompt 1, start from something you have personally seen go wrong, a rule at your school or a gap in your town, then build the proposal outward from that lived detail.
Mine what your application leaves out
For prompt 3, list what is NOT on your application: the way you cook with your grandmother, how you mediate fights, a quiet habit of noticing who gets left out. Pick the one that reveals character.
✕ Weak opening
“From a young age, I have always been passionate about making a difference in the world around me.”
✓ Strong opening
“The recycling bins behind our cafeteria had no lids, so on windy days the whole parking lot turned into a snowstorm of juice cartons.”
The harmonica arrived in a shoebox of my grandfather's things, dented and rusted, missing the screws that held its cover plates. I had asked my mother for his pocketwatch. She gave me this instead, because, she said, it was the only object of his she had ever heard make a sound.1I am not musical. I assumed I would clean it, set it on a shelf, and let it be a quiet relic. But when I tried to play a single note, nothing came out except a flat, breathy wheeze. That annoyed me more than it should have. So I did what I always do when an object refuses to cooperate: I took it apart.Inside, I found the reeds, thin strips of brass fixed at one end, free at the other, each one tuned to a pitch by how much metal had been filed away. One reed was bent, barely, maybe a half-millimeter out of plane. I spent an afternoon learning that this half-millimeter was the entire problem. A reed that does not sit flush will not vibrate cleanly, and a reed that does not vibrate cleanly will not sound.2Here is the unexpected part. I had always thought of sound as something soft, atmospheric, emotional. The thing my grandfather did when he was happy. But sitting at my desk with a jeweler's file and a magnifying glass, I learned that sound is mechanical and unforgiving. Pitch is geometry. A note is just a piece of metal moving at the right speed, and getting it right is a matter of microns, not feeling.3What happened next surprised me more. I got the reed flush, blew the note, and it rang true, and I cried, which I had not planned on. The mechanical explanation had not made the sound less moving. It had made it more so. Every clean note my grandfather ever played had depended on a hundred small alignments he never thought about, and now I did. I understood his music as engineering, and somehow that made it more his.4I started repairing other instruments after that. A neighbor's recorder, a thrift-store melodica with a stuck key, eventually a friend's clarinet whose pads had hardened. I am still not a musician. But I have become the person people hand a broken sound to, and I have learned that the most moving things in a life are usually held together by parts no one bothers to look at.5I keep my grandfather's harmonica on my desk now, playable. Some afternoons I open it just to check that the reeds still sit flush, and to remind myself that curiosity is mostly the willingness to take a thing apart and care about what is inside.
- 1Opening on a concrete, slightly mismatched detail (he wanted the watch, got the harmonica) creates immediate tension and signals a specific story rather than a generic lesson.
- 2The essay slows down to examine a tiny physical mechanism in precise terms. This is Richmond's 'intellectual curiosity in motion' and 'specificity over scale' rendered literally, on a half-millimeter.
- 3Naming the reversal explicitly ('Here is the unexpected part') answers the prompt's exact question and converts a repair anecdote into a genuine shift in how the writer understands the world.
- 4The emotional payoff lands because it was earned by the technical detail, and it complicates the lesson rather than resolving it neatly. The writer holds two truths at once, which reads as mature.
- 5Closing with a concrete pattern of repeated action (other instruments, a new role in the community) shows the lesson produced behavior, not just reflection, and ends on a quietly earned general claim instead of a cliche.
At my high school, the first bell rings at 7:25 in the morning. I learned how indefensible that was not from an article but from my own data, collected by accident.1Last fall, for a statistics project, I asked 214 classmates two questions: what time they fell asleep, and how alert they felt during first period on a scale of one to five. I expected a tired-teenager story. What I found was a fault line. Students who lived in the apartments east of the highway, where the late city bus is the only ride, slept an average of fifty minutes less than students whose families drove them. Their first-period alertness was nearly a full point lower. Same building, same bell, two different mornings.2That distinction matters, because my school's tardy policy treats every late arrival as a discipline problem. Three tardies is a detention. The kids serving those detentions were overwhelmingly the kids the bus had failed. We were punishing students for the geography of their housing and calling it accountability.3So here is what I would propose, and what I have started proposing. First, move the first bell to 8:15. The research on adolescent sleep is not controversial, and districts that have shifted later report better attendance and fewer crashes. But a later bell alone helps the driven kids most, so it cannot be the whole policy.Second, and this is the part I care about, replace the tardy-to-detention pipeline with a transit-adjusted grace window keyed to the published bus schedule. If the only bus that serves your zip code arrives at 8:09, an 8:15 start is humane and an 8:00 start is a trap. The school already has every student's address. The bus times are public. The fix costs nothing but the willingness to admit that a single bell time is not actually fair to a student body that arrives by very different means.4I brought the numbers to our student government in March. We did not win the bell change; that decision sits with the district calendar committee, and it moves slowly. But we did win the grace window, as a one-semester pilot, and this spring the east-side detentions dropped by more than half. I learned that you rarely get the whole policy at once. You get the piece that costs nothing, you prove it works, and you use that to argue for the rest.5Change, I am finding, is less about the platform you are handed than about the spreadsheet you are willing to keep. I still ask the two questions every fall. The gap is narrowing. I intend to keep measuring until it closes, and to keep insisting that fairness is something you can count.
- 1Anchoring a 'social injustice' prompt to a hyper-local, verifiable fact (a 7:25 bell) honors Richmond's preference for specificity over scale and avoids the trap of a grand, abstract cause.
- 2The writer does original, methodical research and reports it in concrete numbers (214 students, fifty minutes, a full point). This is curiosity 'in motion' and it reframes lateness as a structural inequity, not a character flaw.
- 3The essay names the injustice precisely and shows who bears it. This is the 'thoughtful engagement with community' Richmond rewards, grounded in people the writer actually knows.
- 4The proposal is specific, sequenced, and self-critical (it anticipates that the obvious fix helps the wrong group). Proposing a concrete mechanism keyed to real bus schedules shows policy thinking, not just sentiment.
- 5Honest about partial success, the ending shows real-world follow-through and a sophisticated theory of change. Admitting the bell change failed makes the win credible and the writer trustworthy.
Stuck? Start here
- What is something you were genuinely wrong about, and what exact moment or detail changed your mind?
- What is one thing at your school or in your town you have personally watched go badly, and what small, specific change would you propose?
- What is a real part of how you treat people that does not appear anywhere else in your application?
Before you submit
- Did I open in a concrete scene or detail instead of announcing my lesson or passion up front?
- Does my essay reveal something the rest of my application does not already cover?
- By the final lines, have I shown a real change in how I think or act, in the present tense?
Drafted it? Get an honest, admissions-style read, free.
Score my essay