WashU: Who Are You? (Optional, choose one)
250 words
WashU is a place that values a wide range of perspectives. We believe those perspectives come from a variety of experiences and identities. In 250 words or less, respond to one of the following prompts to help us understand “Who are you?” Option 1, “In St. Louis, For St. Louis.” What is a community you are a part of and your place or impact within it? Option 2, “By Name & Story.” How have your life experiences shaped your story?
WashU wants a clear, specific window into a part of you the rest of the application does not show. Option 1 is about a community and how you actually shaped it (impact, not just membership). Option 2 is about how your lived experiences formed who you are. They are equal; pick the one with a real, concrete story behind it. Though labeled optional, treat it as required given the selectivity.
WashU states it values a range of perspectives and wants to understand who you are beyond grades. This is where they look for self-awareness, contribution, and a voice that sounds like a person rather than an applicant. It also rewards effort, since strong students write it and weaker applications skip it.
Do not pick the option that sounds more impressive. Pick the one where you can point to a specific community or experience and a concrete moment inside it.
For the community prompt, zoom into a single moment where you changed something, not a summary of a club's mission. One vivid scene beats three general claims.
Make sure this essay reveals a dimension your activities list and academic essay do not. If it just restates your leadership roles, rewrite it.
“I have always been a part of many communities that have taught me the value of hard work, teamwork, and giving back to others.”
“Every Sunday I translate the church bulletin into Vietnamese for my grandmother, and somewhere in that hour I became the bridge our whole congregation leans on.”
- 1A vivid, unexpected 'community' (diner regulars) instead of a predictable club or team. The specific character and his transferable lesson show self-awareness about how the applicant actually learned to think.
- 2Distills the anecdote into a genuine value statement. WashU wants to see what you would add to its community, so naming the value explicitly sets up the contribution.
- 3Pivots cleanly from the past anecdote to the forward-looking 'what I would add,' which is the actual question being answered.
- 4Concrete, behavioral promises ('notices the classmate going quiet') rather than vague claims of 'diversity.' This makes the contribution believable and specific to who she is.
- Which community has actually changed because you were in it, and what is one moment that proves it?
- What is a part of your story that your transcript and activities list would never reveal on their own?
- When have you played a role nobody assigned you, and what did doing it teach you about yourself?
- Did I pick the prompt where I have a real, specific story rather than the one that sounds impressive?
- Does this essay reveal something new that my academic essay and activities do not already say?
- Did I show one concrete scene of impact or formation instead of summarizing in generalities?
Drafted it? Get an honest, admissions-style read, free.
Score my essay