Hampshire vs Kalamazoo
How Hampshire and Kalamazoo stack up on the numbers that decide where you apply: selectivity, cost after aid, testing, and essays.
| Hampshire | Kalamazoo | |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptance rate | 75% | 76% |
| SAT (middle 50%) | Not reported | 1188-1373 |
| Testing policy | Test-blind | Test-optional |
| Type | Private | Private |
| Location | MA | MI |
| Sticker price (per year) | $72,324 | $82,000 |
| Average cost after aid | $27,556 | $26,050 |
| Supplemental essays | 2 | 1 |
- Hampshire is harder to get into than Kalamazoo (75% versus 76%), so treat it as the bigger reach.
- After aid, Kalamazoo is usually the cheaper option ($26,050 versus $27,556 per year on average).
- On testing, Hampshire is test-blind while Kalamazoo is test-optional.
- Hampshire asks for more supplemental writing (2 essays versus 1), so budget more time for its application.
- Run the free chances calculator to see your real odds at both, then get a free read on each school's essays.
Hampshire vs Kalamazoo FAQ
Is Hampshire or Kalamazoo harder to get into?
Hampshire is harder to get into, admitting about 75% of applicants versus 76% at Kalamazoo.
Is Hampshire or Kalamazoo cheaper?
After financial aid, Kalamazoo is usually cheaper, about $26,050 per year on average versus $27,556 at Hampshire.
See your real chances at Hampshire and Kalamazoo.
Build my college list